Unpacking the Future Me Problem: Understanding Procrastination as a Nervous System Response
- Ashley Renee Hall

- Dec 1, 2025
- 4 min read

Pause with me...
Actually pause.
Before we talk about emotion in leadership or how to “regulate through conflict,” we need to name the habit that hijacks your nervous system before the stress even hits.
Not your workload.
Not your team.
Not the endless Slack pings.
It’s the sentence that slips out when your heart rate spikes: that whispered bargain with avoidance:
“Future me can handle it.”
But the future you is already exhausted. You're running on half-breaths and borrowed energy.
And every time you toggle out of discomfort and into delay, your brain learns a dangerous pattern; that relief only comes from postponement, not action.
And that’s how burnout begins: not with a breakdown, but with tiny daily exits from yourself.
THE “FUTURE ME PROBLEM” LOOP:
WHY PROCRASTINATION IS A NERVOUS SYSTEM RESPONSE, NOT A CHARACTER FLAW
We all whisper it to ourselves:
“That’s a tomorrow problem."
“Future me can handle it.”
“I’ll deal with it when I have more energy/clarity/time.”
But here's the quiet trap hidden in that sentence:
Every time you hand your current discomfort to your “future self,” you’re not avoiding the problem; you’re compounding the pressure.
And your nervous system feels the weight of everything you postpone.
1. PROCRASTINATION IS A FORM OF EMOTIONAL AVOIDANCE
Procrastination is not laziness. The brain attempts to protect you from discomfort right now.
Research shows procrastination is an emotion-regulation strategy, not a time-management problem¹.
Your brain isn’t avoiding the task; it’s avoiding the feeling attached to the task:
fear of failing
fear of doing it wrong
fear of not knowing where to start
fear of discomfort
fear of disappointment (yours or others’)
So your brain chooses temporary relief over future alignment.
But temporary relief has a cost: your future self receives the entire emotional bill.
2. “FUTURE ME” CAN’T SAVE YOU IF “PRESENT ME” IS BURNING OUT
The more you push off now, the more overloaded your future becomes.
And overloaded futures create burnout.
Why?
Because burnout isn’t caused by doing too much, it’s caused by chronically avoiding what needs to be done until everything collapses at once.
This is called cognitive load accumulation, and research shows that when mental load builds without release, your stress hormones stay elevated, your prefrontal cortex shuts down, and your decision-making tanks².
So the tiny tasks you avoided because they felt uncomfortable become massive threats to your system later.
3. THE NERVOUS SYSTEM INTERPRETS AVOIDANCE AS DANGER
When you avoid something repeatedly, your brain learns:
“This must be dangerous, or she wouldn’t keep avoiding it.”
Avoidance actually increases anxiety, not decreases it³.
So the next time you face the task:
your heart rate spikes
your chest tightens
your mind spirals
your brain can’t focus
you feel overwhelmed before you begin
The nervous system doesn’t care about logic. It cares about pattern.
And when the pattern is avoidance, the state is stress.
4. “FUTURE ME” THINKING DESTROYS SELF-TRUST
Every time you tell yourself you’ll handle it later, and don’t, you teach your brain:
“I don’t follow through.”
This erodes:
confidence
boundaries
leadership presence
self-trust
Research shows that self-trust is built through micro-action consistency, not big achievements⁴.
So when women feel inconsistent in leadership, it’s not because they “lack discipline.”
It’s because they’ve trained their nervous system to expect inconsistency.
Not by intention, but by postponing the small, uncomfortable things that build trust.
5. “FUTURE ME” THINKING MAKES BURNOUT INEVITABLE
Here’s the blunt truth:
Avoidance today guarantees burnout tomorrow.
Burnout is not a sudden event; it’s the accumulation of unaddressed stress, unmade decisions, and unspoken boundaries.
When leaders repeatedly say:
“Not now.”
“Later.”
“I’ll deal with it when things calm down.”
…they unknowingly build the exact future they fear.
This is called temporal discounting; the brain undervalues future well-being in order to escape present discomfort⁵.
It’s a predictable psychological trap.
And women in leadership fall into it far more often because they are juggling emotional labor, perfectionism, people-pleasing, and fear of disappointing others⁶.
6. THE ANTIDOTE: SMALL REGULATION + SMALL ACTION (NOW)
The answer isn’t to “push harder” or “be more disciplined.”
It’s this:
Regulate → Name → Shift.
Regulate
Bring your nervous system out of threat mode.
A 60-second exhale practice, cold water on your hands, a quick walk outside, anything that signals safety to the body.
Name
Call the pattern what it is:
avoidance
fear of discomfort
overwhelm
people-pleasing
perfectionism
emotional responsibility
Naming untangles the emotional knot.
Shift
Take the smallest possible action that contradicts the pattern:
send one email
delegate one task
make one decision
block 10 minutes on your calendar
finish the task you’ve delayed longest
Micro-actions create neuroplasticity; they rewire your brain toward capability rather than fear⁷.
This is the bridge between intention and transformation.
THE REAL TRUTH?
“FUTURE YOU” IS JUST YOU, WITH A BIGGER BACKLOG.
You can postpone the task. You can postpone the conversation. You can postpone the boundary. You can postpone the decision.
But you can’t postpone the emotional consequences.
If you’re honest, you already feel the weight.
So ask yourself:
What am I avoiding today that my future self will have to crawl out from under?
What discomfort am I postponing at the cost of my current illusion of comfort?
What small action would rebuild trust in myself right now?
Your future isn’t built later. It’s built in the next 10 seconds.
And you’re the only one who can choose differently.
References
Sirois, F. M., & Pychyl, T. A. (2013). Procrastination and emotional regulation. Personality and Individual Differences, 55(8). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.02.008
LeBlanc, V. R. (2009). The effects of acute stress on performance. The Journal of Emergency Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2008.05.004
Barlow, D. H. (2002). Anxiety and Its Disorders. Guilford Press.
Zell, E., & Krizan, Z. (2014). Do people have accurate self-assessments? Perspectives on Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614554076
Ainslie, G. (2001). Breakdown of Will. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511498625
Devloo, T., & Anseel, F. (2021). Do women leaders experience more burnout? Journal of Applied Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000820
Davidson, R. J., & McEwen, B. S. (2012). Social influences on neuroplasticity. Nature Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3043




Comments